SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 21

S.DASARADHA RAMA REDDY
Poddar Projects Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


DASARADHA RAMA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition, filed on 15/12/1989, under section 433 (e) and (f) read with section 439 (1) (b) of the Companies Act, 1956, for the winding up of the respondent-company, the petitioner alleges that in the course of business the respondent had purchased M. S. ingots and billets and other materials worth Rs. 28,14,658. 50 from it during the period from July, 1984, to December, 1986, and that the respondent is due as on November 30, 1989, in a sum of Rs. 20,74,531. 83 inclusive of interest at 24 per cent. per annum. The respondent failed to pay the amount in spite of repeated reminders. The petitioner issued statutory notice under section 434 (1) (a) and (c) of the Companies Act on 11/11/1989, and the company in its reply denied the liability. The respondent filed a counter denying its liability to pay any amount and averring that the petitioner has waived its claim, that in any event, the claim is barred by limitation, that in order to overcome the bar of limitation the petitioner has filed this petition and that the financial condition of the respondent-company is sound. It is also stated in the additional counter that there were differences between














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top