SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 10

B.S.A.SWAMY, M.N.RAO
Yusuf Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
Moulana Mohd. Jamaluddin Deccani – Respondent


M. N. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE three writ appeals are from the common judgment of our learned brother Motilal B. Naik, J. , in W. P. Nos. 16111 and 16122 of 1994 setting aside the appointments of the appellants in W. A. No. 401 and 1087 of 1995 as members of the Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board (for short "the Wakf Board") reconstituted by the Government of Andhra Pradesh in G. O. Ms. No. 74, Minorities Welfare (Wakf-I) Dated 26-8-1994 read with the errata issued in G. O. Ms. No. 75 dated 30-8-1994.

( 2 ) IN and by the above two orders, all the appellants herein had been appointed as members of the Wakf Board under Section 11 of the Wakf Act, 1954 and they were also required to elect a Chairman under subsection (2) of Section 10 of the Act.

( 3 ) W. P. No. 16111 of 1994 was filed by two persons claiming themselves to be the Muthawallis of Masjid-e-Mohammedi and Masjid-e-Kasiri at Hyderabad while W. P. No. 16122 of 1994 was filed by Anjuman-e-Shiah Imamiya Isnah Ashrai (Akhbari), claiming to be an association of Shia Muslims of Akhbari Sect, represented by its Secretary, Syed Sajjad Razvi.

( 4 ) IN W. P. No. 16111 of 1994, it was alleged, inter alia, that the reconstitution of the Wakf Bo

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top