P. S. MISHRA, C. J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the appellants (workmen) and the learned counsel for the respondents (management ).

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that the (respondents) appellants were employed in the coke manufacturing industry of the respondent-management. They were subjected to a domestic enquiry and removed from service on the alleged proof of various allegations levelled against them. The Labour Court ordered reinstatement without back-wages. The management moved this Court under article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court at the time of admission of the writ petition granted stay on condition of complying with the requirements of section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The appeal against the said order under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent was dismissed. There is some proceeding taken in the Court of the District Munsif, Hyderabad West and south, Ranga Reddy in O. S. No. 180 of 1986 in which an order of interim injunction is granted on 9-9-1988 in the following terms:"the Court doth order that interim injunction be awareded restraining the respondents, their agents, servants, nominees etc. , or any person claiming through them, from hol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document