S. DASARADHA RAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit which was filed for recovery of the money due to the plaintiff s firm. After the arguments were heard and judgment was reserved in the suit, the petitioner filed I. A. No. 2079/95, out of which the present Civil Revision Petition arises, for reopening the matter and recalling the plain tiff for the purpose of filing the partnership deed. The Court below dismissed this petition following the decision in "t. Ramachandra vs. K. Rama Murthy and others".

( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petition has to be considered as filed under Order 18, Rule 17-A and not under Order 18, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that in the decision of this Court in "t. Ramachandra vs. K. Rama Murthy and others" Order 18, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure was interpreted and Order 18, Rule 17-A was not brought to the notice of the Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also relied on Manjunadha Sarma vs. Union Bank of India", "adalat Choudhary vs. Satan choudhary" and "suresh Kumar vs. Baldev Raj". In "manjunadha Sarma vs. Union bank of India" petition for reopening was filed un

Click Here to Read the rest of this document