SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 130

B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Gottipati Narasimhulu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Devineni Gangi Naidu – Respondent


B. K. SOMASEKHARA, J.

( 1 ) THE judgment and decree of the learned additional Subordinate Judge, Tirupati in a. S. No. 34 of 1980, dated 10-2-1987 dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree of the learned principal District Munsif, Tirupati in O. S. No. 693 of 1978, dated 31-1-1980 are in challenge in this appeal. The appellant herein is the plaintiff. The respondents herein were the defendants. Defendant nos. 1 and 2, who are respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are dead and their legal representatives were brought on record.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed the suit for declaration of his title to the suit property and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants therein from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the same. The suit property is an agricultural land bearing Survey No. 19/3 with an extent of 1 acre 48 cents situated at Pulicheralpalem village in Chittoor District. The defendants are close relatives. Defendant Nos. 1 to 5 and 7 are the brothers and Defendants No. 8 to 10 are the sisters of Defendant Nos. 1 to 5 and 7. They resisted the suit plaintiff claims the title to the suit property through defendant No. 6 who had purchased the suit property from










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top