SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 185

B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Kamatam Komuraiah – Appellant
Versus
Garlapati Sandhya Rani – Respondent


B. K. SOMASEKHARA, J.

( 1 ) THE defendants in O. S. No. 763 of 1983 and the respondents in A. S. No. 82 of 1987 who suffered a decree in the appeal before the learned Additional district Judge, Warangal on 20-7-1988 have come up with this appeal. The respondent is the plaintiff in the suit and the appellant in the appeal. The plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with her possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule properties by opening a channel or digging etc. It was dismissed. The plaintiff took the matter in appeal and the learned District Judge allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif and consequently passed a decree for permanent injunction as prayed for in the suit. That is how the appellants who are defendants in the suit and the respondents in the appeal are aggrieved and present this appeal.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is the owner in possession and enjoyment of S. No. 49 measuring Ac. 2. 32 guntas situated at Obulapur Village, which is the suit property. There is a rivulet known as Jalu Vagu abutting the land of the plaintiff. Defendants 2 and 3 are the younger brothers of the fi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top