SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 212

K.S.SHRIVASTAVA
Vettikuti Naydamma – Appellant
Versus
Mupparaju Madhusudhana Rao – Respondent


K. S. SHRIVASTAV, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in this revision are the plantiffs in O. S. No. 19 of 1985 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Bapatla.

( 2 ) THIS revision shall also dispose of the Civil Revision Petitions No. 2164 and 2167 of 1995 because of commonality of question of law and similarity of facts.

( 3 ) THE facts giving rise to these revisions, in brief, are that - the deceased 1st plantiff was the husband of the deceased 2nd plantiff. The deceased 1st plaintiff was the owner of the suit properties. He filed O. S. Nos. 18,19 and 20 of 1985 against separate defendant in these suits for cancellation of the gift deeds in respect of the suit properties al leged to have been executed by him in favour of the defendant on the ground that he suffered a paralysis attack some time in the month of December, 1985 and became physically handicapped and lost his speech. At that time he was staying alone in his house because the 2nd plaintiff since deceased had abandoned him about thirteen years back and had started living with the defendant. The defendant with the help of his brothers, parents and the 2nd plaintiff since deceased admitted him in Sujata Nursing Home at nidubrolu for t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top