SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 236

G.BIKSHAPATHY
K. V. S. Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Vice Chancellor, Nagarjuna University, Guntur – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioner approaches this Court seeking issuance of Writ or Order 5 quashing the proceedings No. NU/ss2/mec/m-95/95, dated: 27-9-1995] issued by the 2nd respondent.

( 2 ) THE petitioner submits that he passed B. Com. I and II year. He was appearing for B. Com. III year Costing examination, the last examination which was taking place on 24-3-1995. While the petitioner was writing the examination, the flying squad entered into the examination hall and alleged that the petitioner was in possession forbidden material. Thereafter the Chief superintendent of Examinations issued Memo on24-3-1995 informing that the petitioner had resorted to malpractices during the examination in Room No. 8 - Four pages were found besides the candidate outside the window. The petitioner submitted necessary explanation denying the allegations levelled against him. However, the Special Officer Examinations issued a Memo dated 18-5-1995 stating that the petitioner was in possession of manuscript copying material and again his explanation was called for. The petitioner submitted his explanation denying the allegations for the second time. But, however the final proceedings were iss






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top