SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 298

M.N.RAO, V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
Komatyreddy Pushpalatha – Appellant
Versus
Election Officer, Nellipaka Gram Panchayat – Respondent


M. N. RAO, J.

( 1 ) A great part of the Aswapuram mandal consists of scheduled areas, in respect of which the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act has no application. However, there are four villages in this mandal, which are outside the scheduled area; they are Nellipaka, Mallela Madugu, Mondikunta and Anandapuram. A notification was issued on 7-6-1995 by the Election Officer showing that Nellipaka Gram Panchayat was reserved in the general category for women. However on t-6-1995 another notification was issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Which is to the effect that Nellipaka is ear-marked in the general category, but not exclusively for women.

( 2 ) CHALLENGING the same the present writ petition was filed by one Smt. Komatireddy Pushpalatha, claiming to be an ex-sarpanch of Nellipaka, contending that the reservation made once cannot be altered after the election notification was issued. Another ground taken in the writ petition is that the second respondent, namely, the Revenue Divisional Officer is the competent authority to notify the reservation, but contrary to law, the same was done by the Election Officer. On these ground s the petitioner seeks a declaration that the elec


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top