Land certified as agricultural land on the date of commencement of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, loses its character as agricultural land if its user is changed. The coming into force of a Master Plan subsequent to the date of enactment does not affect this change of character.

( 1 ) THE question for consideration in this writ petition is whether the land certified to be agricultural land on the date of commencement of the Urban land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short, the Act ), would continue to retain its character as agricultural land even after it was divided into house sites and sold? The petitioner was the pattadar in respect of agricultural lands covered by Sy. Nos. 63, 71 and 72 of Karmanghat village within the urban agglomeration of Hyderabad. On the coming into force the Act, she and her four daughters and one son filed separate declarations under Section6 (1)of the act in respect of the land s, before the Special Officer and Competent Authority, urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad, (for short, the Special Officer ). As the petitioner had a doubt regarding the nature of the land, she obtained a certificate from the Special Officer under Section 2 (o) of the Act read with the clarification issued by the Government in their memo No. 6922/uc. l/76. 4 dated 31-1-1977, to the effect that the provisions of the Act are not attracted in respect of the above land. The Special officer declared this land as agricultural land by his order dated 27-9-1978.

( 2 ) BY the end of 1978 all the lands were sold away by the petitioner in favour of several persons as house sites. By a G. O. Ms. No. 391 dated 23-6-1980 the master Planinrespectof Hyderabad was issuedanditcame into operation with effect from 23-9-1980. The area covered by the land in question was shown as residential zone in the Master Plan.

( 3 ) THE Special officer, in 1981, issued notice to re-open the question of determination of excess land. The petitioner objected to the re-opening of the question, on the ground of earlier orders declaring the lands outside the scope of the Act. Over-looking the objections, the Special Officer determined the excess land at 1,62,625-00 Sq. Mts. , by an order dated. 24-11-1984, which was confirmed by the appellate authority on 27-6-1985. Challenging the same, the present writ petition was filed.

( 4 ) SRI Gopal Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, relying upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Smt. Atia Mohammadi Begum vs. State of U. P. , contends that the character of the land cannot be changed on the basis of the coming into force of the Master Plan subsequent to the date of the enactment. We do not agree. 4-A. The Act came into force from 17-2-1976. The definition of urban land under Section 2 (o) of the Act, no doubt excludes lands which are mainly used for the purpose of agriculture. A vacant land is defined by Section 2 (q) of the act as land not being land mainly used for purpose of agriculture, in an urban agglomeration. Section 3 of the Act enjoins that with effect from the date of the commencement of the Act, no person shall be entitled to hold vacant land in excess of the ceil ing limit. In respect of city of Hyderabad the ceiling limit fixed is 1000 Sq. Mts. The land which was certified to be an agricultural land, when the act came into force, could not continue to retain its identity as agricultural land even after its user was changed. It would not be treated as urban land so long as it was mainly used for the purpose of agriculture. When once the user was changed, it would become automatically vacant land within the meaning of section 2 (q)of the Act. Under Section 6 of the Act every person holding land in excess of the ceiling limit at the commencement of the Act, is obliged to file a statement giving particulars of all vacant lands held by him. Cl. (ii) of the explanation to Section 6 of the Act says that the commencement of the Act means,-"where any land, not beingvacant land situated in a State in which this Act is in force has become vacant land by any reason whatsoever, the date on which such land becomes vacant land;"

( 5 ) BY virtue of the above Explanation, when the land in question ceased to be an agricultural land itassumed the character of vacant l