SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 366

M.N.RAO, V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
K. Narsing – Appellant
Versus
The Special Court under A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, Hyderabad rep. by its Chairman – Respondent


V. RAJAGOPALA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition arises out of an order dated 2-2-1994 in L. G. A. No. 40 of 1993 on the file of the 1st respondent-Special Court constituted under the Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, (for short, the Special Court ), confirming the order of the 2nd respondent - Special Tribunal - cum - District Judge, Adilabad, constituted under A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, (for short, the Special Tribunal ), dated 2-7-1993 in L. G. O. P. No. 9/89.

( 2 ) THE petitioners are the appellants before the Special Court and the respondents before the Special Tribunal. The respondents approached the Special Tribunal stating that they had purchased the petition schedule property from P. W. 4 under the registered sale deed dt. 12-5-1980 and that the petitioners have grabbed the suit schedule land without any right over the same. It is their case that the petition schedule property viz. , plot No. 87 of 50 x30 , situate at Hamidpura locality of Adilabad town, originally belonged to the Municipality of Adilabad. In 1967 the Municipality assigned the land in favour of one Narayana under Ex. A-5 and one Rajeswar, P. W. 4, purchased the same under Ex. A-3 registered sa












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top