SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 391

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, P.S.MISHRA
P. Prabhakarrao – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank, rep. by the Chairman and Managing Director, New Delhi – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant-writ petitioner prays for a Writ, order and directions, particularly one in the nature of Certiorari quashing the imposition of two minor penalties of censure dated 12-7-1984 and 30-10-1985, (2) direct the 1st respondent-Bank to consider his case and correct his seniority and quash the orders of promotions of July, 1983, July-August, 1984 and April, 1986 of the respondents 4 to 16 in the writ petition and (3) restrain the 1st respondent-Bank from holding Departmental Promotion Committee without granting him proforma promotion in conformity with the seniority-cum-merit on the basis of the seniority list as at June, 1983.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts necessary for adjudication of the writ appeal in brief may be summarised. The appellant-writ petitioner entered the service of the 1st respondent- Punjab National Bank as a Probationary Officer on 2-2-1963 and on successful completion of the probationary period and after having undergone the necessary training, the petitioner was confirmed as on Officer and posted at the Branch Office at Guntur in 1966 as an Accountant. He was thereafter promoted successively as Officer-in-Charge in 1971, Manager




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top