SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 436

G.BIKSHAPATHY, V.BHASKARA RAO
Government Of A. P. rep. , by Its Secretary to Government, Law department, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Battarusetti Chenna Kesavarao – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) FEELING aggrieved by the common orders of the learned Single Judge in writ Petition Nos. 2054/95 and Batch dated 25-3-1995, the Government has come up with this Batch of Writ Appeals.

( 2 ) THE Government Pleaders and Assistant Government Pleaders in the districts of Andhra Pradesh filed Writ Petitions challenging the orders passed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh terminating their services before the expiry of their term. It is their case that they were appointed by the respective district Collectors on the basis of panels forwarded by the respective District judges. There are no statutory rules prescribing the method and manner of appointment of Government Pleaders and Assistant Government Pleaders. Therefore, the Government issued executive instructions in G. O. Ms. No. 57 law Department, dated 16-3-1990 stipulating the procedure to be followed while making appointment to the post of Government Pleaders and Assistant government Pleaders in the Districts. Thus they were appointed in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Government. The principal grievance of the government Counsel is that once they were appointed for a particular tenure, their s





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top