SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 477

R.M.BAPAT
Late R. Satya Bai – Appellant
Versus
Rachakonda Venkat Rao – Respondent


R. M. BAPAT, J.

( 1 ) ONE late R. Satya Bai, wife of Rachakonda Ramgopal Rao, filed O. S. No. 4 of 1975 in the Court of the District Judge, Adilabad. The suit was filed for partition and separate possession against 13defendants. During the pendency of the suit, there was a compromise between the plaintiffs and the defendants and a preliminary decree for partition in terms of compromise came to be passed on 13-7-1978 and the property as described in Schedule- I was allotted in the shares of the plaintiffs. Three items were kept jointly. Thereafter, the original plaintiff no. 1 i. e. , (late) Satya Bai died. Her legal representative filed LA. No. 1268/91 for appointment of Court Commissioner for dividing the property by metes and bounds and putting the second plaintiff in possession of her share.

( 2 ) ON presentation of the application for final decree, notice was issued to all the defendants. The claim of the second plaintiff was resisted by the 1st defendant alone. The first defendant-1st respondent herein filed counter and stated mat after passing of the final decree, the decree was modified by oral agreement. It was further contended by him that the decree was modified by oral ag















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top