SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 470

R.M.BAPAT
K. Venkatrama Naidu – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. , rep. by the District Collector, Chittoor – Respondent


R. M. BAPAT, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners herein were the original plaintiffs in O. S. No. 129 of 1984 and O. S. No. 53 of 1982 respectively pending on the file of the Prl. Subordinate judge, Chittoor. The respondents herein were the defendants.

( 2 ) C. R. P. NO. 3724 of 1994 arises out of the judgment passed in C. M. A. No. 42 of 1992 on the file of the District Judge, Chittoor, which arises out of I. A. No. 699/88 in O. S. No. 129 of 1984.

( 3 ) C. R. P. NO. 3779 of 1994 arises out of the judgment passed in C. M. A. No. 43 of 1992 on the file of the District Judge, Chittoor, which arises out of LA. No. 700/88 in O. S. No. 53 of 1982.

( 4 ) THE suits filed by the petitioners herein were dismissed. Against the said orders, the petitioners herein preferred two Interlocutory Applications i. e. , i. A. No. 699/88 in O. S. No. 129/84 and I. A. No. 700/88 in O. S. No. 53 of 1982 respectively in the Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Chittoor. Both the I. As. , alleged to have been filed under Order IX Rule 9 C. P. C. to set aside the orders of dismissal. Both the I. As. , were dismissed by the Principal subordinate Judge, Chittoor. Against the said orders, the above said c. M. A. Nos















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top