SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 654

NEELAM SANJIVA REDDY, S.PARVATHA RAO
Mohd. Shaheryar Khan – Appellant
Versus
Humaira Khan – Respondent


B. PARVATHARAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals are preferred under Section 47 of the Guardians and wards Act, 1890 ( the Act for short) questioning the order dated 14-6-1995 of the Family Court at Hyderabad in O. P. No. 35 of 1995, which was so numbered on 3-6-1995 after O. P. No. 1021 of 1994 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad, was transferred to that Court after it was established on 4-3-1995. C. M. A. Nos. 793 and 886 of 1995 are preferred by the respondent and the petitioner in the O. P. respectively against that order. They are heard together and they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) THIS is a case where the mother and father contest for the guardianship of the person of their children and illustrates the psychological trauma experienced by the children in the process at their very impressionable age. Humaira Khan is the mother and petitioner in the O. P. Mohammed Shaheryar khan is the father and respondent in the O. P. They will be referred to hereafter as the petitioner and the respondent respectively. They belong to the Sunni sect of Muslims. They were married on 3-12-1987. They have three minor children. The eldest is a s






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top