SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 634

G.BIKSHAPATHY, V.BHASKARA RAO
T. Sridhar – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Electricity Board, hyderabad – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) THE Writ Appeals are directed against the common orders of the learned single Judge dated 1-3-1995 in W. P. Nos. 10195/1991 and 2930/1992.

( 2 ) THE Appellants are the Writ Petitioners. The petitioners challenged the proceedings of the Board in B. P. Ms. No. 223, dated 3-8-1991 promoting the unofficial Respondents to the post of Assistant Executive Engineers (Civil) as illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 and for consequential direction to the respondent Board to promote them as Assistant Executive Engineers by relaxing the requirement of service experience.

( 3 ) THE petitioners were initially appointed as Draftsmen in the Board service and their services were regularised. The contesting Respondents were appointed as Additional Assistant Engineers (Civil) in the Irrigation department of Government of Andhra Pradesh and they were sent on deputation to the Board. The petitioners as well as the contesting Respondents were possessing the educational qualifications of Diploma in Engineering. The unofficial Respondents have been making representation to the Board to absorb them in the Board services. Therefore after considering the matter, the Board issue










































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top