SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 628

R.M.BAPAT
Kalagara Hari Babu – Appellant
Versus
Edupuganti Krishna Rao – Respondent


R. M. BAPAT, J.

( 1 ) THE Appellant herein was the original plaintiff in O. S. No. 124 of 1985 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kovvur, West Godavari District. The plaintiff filed the said suit for compensation from the defendants-respondents herein for using defamatory words against the petitioner herein. The said suit was dismissed for default. Therefore, the appellant herein filed an application I. A. No. 1063 of 1994 in the same Court for restoring the suit to file under Order 9 Rule 9 C. P. C. after setting aside the default order dated 15-9-1994. It appears from the record that the said application was dismissed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Kovvur. Against the said order, the present appeal has been filed by the appellant herein.

( 2 ) IT appears from the record that the suit was fixed for hearing after adjourning the same (on) two or three occasions and the appellant herein was directed to lead evidence, but the appellant herein refused to lead evidence and therefore the learned Judge dismissed I. A. No. 1063 of 1994 with the following observations:"the suit is of the year 1985. The suit was being adjourned at the request of parties and also on petitions. On 15-6-19











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top