SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 736

B.S.RAIKOTE, S.S.M.QUADRI
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Apex Agencies – Respondent


SYED SHAM MOHAMMED QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THE short question that falls for consideration in this tax revision case, filed by the State under section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales tax Act, 1957 is whether electronic calculators are assessable to tax under entry No. 12 or entry No. 38 (v) of the First Schedule to the A. P. General Sales Tax Act.

( 2 ) THE assessing authority assessed to tax under entry No. 12. On appeal, the Appellate Deputy commissioner confirmed the order of the assessing authority taking the view that the electronic calculators fall under entry No. 12 of the First Schedule. The assessee went in appeal before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal took the view that the electronic calculators fall under entry 38 (v) and accordingly allowed the appeal on 1/12/1988. Hence this revision.

( 3 ) THE learned Special Government Pleader contends that as calculating machines are specifically dealt with under entry No. 12, therefore the Tribunal was in error in treating it as falling under entry 38 (v ).

( 4 ) TO appreciate the contention of the learned Government Pleader, it will be useful to read entry 12 and entry 38 (v) as they stood in the relevant assessmen



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top