( 1 ) THIS Revision is filed against the order passed in O. S. No. 39/90 on the file of district Munsif, Zaheerabad.

( 2 ) THE brief facts are as follows:- when DW-1 was being examined, two documents purported to be partition deeds dated 24-4-1961 and 27-5-1961 respectively, were sought to be marked. That was resisted by the plaintiff. The partition deed dated 24-4-1961 was engrossed on a stamp paper worth of Rs. 2/ -. Defendants 6 and 7 are one party and defendants 1 to 3 and the plaintiff are the second party. The plaintiff and defendants 2 and 3 were minors. Therefore, the step mother of defendant No. 1 has represented mem in the said document. The stamp duty and penalty were collected on this document on 10-8-1994. There is an endorsement to that effect on the reverse of the document by the Sub-Registrar, Medak of Sangareddy. The question arose is whether that document is admissible in evidence because of non-registration. Partition deed dated 27-5-1961 is with the heading "deed of Partition". This is unstamped and unregistered. This document was executed between defendant No. 6 and defendant No. 1. Defendant No. 1 represented her minor children i. e. , plaint