Y. BHASKAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition raises an important question of law: "whether the transfer of assigned land by the petitioner, who perfected his title by adverse possession by the date of commencement of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977, is amenable to the jurisdiction of the Joint collector under the Act.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are that the father of the petitioner purchased an extent of Ac. 7-39 cents of land in S. No. 443-1 of Kodihalli village, Agali Mandal, anantapur district vide a registered sale deed dated 13-9-1944 from the original assignee, Fareed Sab. Since the date of purchase, the petitioner s father and after his death, the petitioner are in the possession of the land. While so, the second respondent issued a show-cause notice dated 20th September, 1988, to the original assignee, directing him to appear on 6-10-1988 and offer his explanation as to why the assignment made to him in S. No. 433-1 of Kodihalli village should not be cancelled for violating the conditions of D-Form patta. A copy of the said notice was also marked to the petitioner. The petitioner submitted his explanation stating that he is residing in a village which is adjacent to the land in question and that his father purchased the said land in good faith for a valuable consideration. The Joint Collector, after considering the explanation submitted by the petitioner and after conducting enquiry held that the original assignee - Fareed Sab alienated the land to the father of the petitioner, who is residing in Karanataka State and that the land was not brought under cultivation within three years from the date of assignment. As the conditions of D-Form patta were violated, the Joint Collector passed an order of eviction against the petitioner on 19-5-1989. This order was not communicated to the petitioner and the M. R. O. the first respondent initiated proceedings to assign the land to third parties. Therefore, the petitioner filed this writ petition questioning the action of the respondents in evicting the petitioner. However, the order passed by the Joint Collector on 7-10-1988 was communicated to the petitioner on 18-9-1989.

( 3 ) THE petitioner s Counsel firstly contended that the Joint Collector has no jurisdiction to initiate the resumption proceedings under the Board standing Orders as the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of transfers) Act, 1977, (for short the A. P. Act 9 of 1977 ) governs the said aspect and that therefore the impugned order is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.

( 4 ) THE facts of the case show that the show-cause notice was issued to the original assignee to show-cause as to why the assignment should not be cancelled for not bringing the land under cultivation. The copy of show-cause notice was marked to the petitioner, who filed the explanation. After considering the explanation of the petitioner, the second respondent passed the order of resumption of the land. The object of the A. P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 is to assign Government waste lands to the landless poor persons. The rules regarding assignment of land and the conditions of d Form pattas prohibit alienation of lands assigned to landless poor and provide for its resumption as well as reassignment to eligible persons. However, past experience has shown that substantial extents of lands assigned to landless poor persons have been actually alienated and are in possession of well-to-do persons. As the existing rules do not provide for punishment of persons who have purchased such lands, efforts made for assigning large extents of lands to landless poor persons are going waste. With a view to enforce the object of the Act more effectively, it is considered that a protective legislation is necessary prescribing punishment against persons who have purchased assigned lands on the model of legislation existing in regard to the Scheduled Tribes in the scheduled area

Click Here to Read the rest of this document