SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 769

S.V.MARUTHI
Ch. Yashoda Devi – Appellant
Versus
B. Dayakar Reddy – Respondent


S. V. MARUTHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision is filed against the order in I. A. No. 712/89 in A. S. No. 19/1988 on the file of the first Addl. District Judge, Warangal. Plaintiffs 2 and 3 are the petitioners herein.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed a suit O. S. No. 64/85 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, jangaon for partition of the suit schedule properties consisting of survey numbers 461/4 and 461/5. Against the preliminary decree in O. S. No. 64/85, a. S. No. 19/88 was filed in the First Addl. District Court, Warangal. Pending disposal of the appeal, I. A. No. 712/89 was filed under Order 1 Rule 10 C. P. C. by the first respondent in the C. R. P. requesting the Court to implead him as a party to the suit for partition.

( 3 ) THE first respondent was appointed as Receiver-Commissioner by the chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in I. A. No. 1874/82 in O. S. No. 18/63. O. S. No. 18/63 was filed by one Mir Abbas Hyder Kazmi against Smt. Saleha fatima for the administration of the Estate belonging to Mir Abbas Hyder kazmi. In the suit one Sri Ahamed Sharif, Advocate, Jangaon was appointed as receiver-Commissioner for administration of the suit schedule properties. He took possession of th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top