S. PARVATHA RAO. J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner seeks a writ, directing the respondents to absorb him in the post of l. D. C/helper or in any other suitable post in terms of Memo. No. OSD (P)/dm. l/a3/l 138/ 85. 1 dated26-8-1985 in the existing vacancies in the interests of justice etc.

( 2 ) THE petitioner admittedly worked as casual labourer only for 106 days during the period21-8-1991 to 5-12-1991, more than six years after the said memo dated 26-8-1985 was issued. That memo dealt with the cases of ex-casual labourers, who worked in the board prior to 1981 and really has no application to the petitioner. However, the learned Counsel for the petitioner relies on the judgment of P. A. Choudary, J. , in Writ petition No. 10274 of 1986 and batch dated 10-3-1987. In that batch of writ petitions, the petitioners who worked as casual labourers during the years 1982,1983,1984,1985 and 1986 complained that they were excluded from the benefit of consideration for regular employment under Memo dated 26-8-1985 on the ground that it was limited to cases of ex-casual labourers who worked prior to 1981. The learned Judge held that the said memo was based on a policy adopted by the andhra Pradesh Stat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document