SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 786

K.B.SIDDAPPA
Rajeti Kanchayya – Appellant
Versus
Gundu Bhaskaramma – Respondent


K. B. SIDDAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision is filed against the judgment passed in C. M. A. No. 15/94 on the file of Additional District Judge, Vizianagaram.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff who is the Revision Petitioner herein had filed the suit for perpetual injunction. He has also filed a petition for ad-interim injunction which was granted. Aggrieved by the said order the defendant preferred Civil miscellaneous Appeal which was allowed.

( 3 ) AGAINST the said Judgment in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal the present revision is filed by the plaintiff.

( 4 ) THE learned counsel appearing for the Revision petitioner submitted that d-Form Patta was given to the plaintiff in respect of Ac. 1-75 cents in the year 1976. Subsequently, D-Form Patta was also given in respect of the same land in favour of the father of the 1st respondent on 1-9-1986 as he is an ex-service man. The plaintiff stated that the subsequent granting of D-Form Patta in favour of the father of the 1st respondent was manipulated etc. This was considered by the Mandal Revenue Officer and the Mandal Revenue Officer after enquiry passed order in Ex. A-5, dated 27-12-1993 holding that the plaintiff is entitled for d-Form Patta and in pursuan






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top