SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 784

M.N.RAO, V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
Tadi Surya Rao – Appellant
Versus
Gurubhavatula Ramakrishna Rao – Respondent


M. N,RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE two writ petitions are inter-connected and so they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) SEEKING a writ of certiorari for quashing the common judgment of the special Court under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, hyderabad (for short "the Special Court") in LG. C. Nos. 23 of 1993 and 68 of 1994, these applications were filed by Tadi Surya Rao, a resident of visakhapatnam, who was declared by the Special Court as a land grabber within the meaning of Section 2 (b) and (e) of the Andhra Pradesh Land grabbing (Prohibition) Act, (for short "the Act") and was directed to deliver vacant possession of Plot Nos. 70 and 71 covered by approved lay-out bearing no. 61/64 situate 16 at Narasimha Nagar, Viskhapatnam to Dr. Gurubhavathula ramakrishna Rao (respondent No. 1 herein) applicant in L. G. C. No. 23 of 1993 before the Special Court or his nominee.

( 3 ) IN the year 1991, Gurubhavathula Ramakrishna Rao, respondent No. 1 herein, filed L. G. C. No. 64 of 1991 before the Special Court in respect of the same property in question and a report was called for by the Special Court from the mandal Revenue Officer, Visakhapatnam, which discl





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top