SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 790

P.S.MISHRA, S.S.HUSSAINI
G. Picheswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Sub Inspector of Police – Respondent


P. S. MISHRA, J.

( 1 ) THE instant proceeding has been started treating the telegram by G. Picheswara Rao to the Chief Justice as a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and taken up by the Legal Services Authority. Telegram contained the following information : "respected Lordship I would like to bring to your kind notice that the Nuzvid Rural Police Sub-Inspector high handedly taken away my father, sister-in-law on 1-8-96, 8 a. m. The police did not bring any Mahila Constable (.) The Sub-Inspector high-handedly caught hold my sister-in-law and abused her in filthy language (.) The police interfered in civil matter (.) He wrongfully detained our people in Nuzvid Rural Police Station (.) The Sub-Inspector openly declaring that he will foist a false case against them (.) Soon after the incident I rushed to Vijayawada to in form my relatives (.) The police have no authority to interfere in civil matter (.) Please treat this telegram as writ and do justice in the matter (.) G. PICHESWARY RAO. " Under the scheme evolved by the Legal Services Authority of the State, when allegations are specifically made of wrongful detention at the Police Station, the Court got a prel








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top