SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 826

R.BAYAPU REDDY
O. G. Sankar – Appellant
Versus
S. Veera Sameera Kumar Dev – Respondent


R. BAYAPU REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals are filed against the decree and judgment of the Principal subordinate Judge, Guntur dt 17-3-1989 passed in O. S. No. 191/1983 and o. S. NO. 9/86 respectively.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff in O. S. No. 191/83 who is the first respondent in A. S. No. 1788 of 1989 had filed the said suit against the defendants 1 to 4 in that suit contending as follows: The plaint schedule house originally belonged to the first defendant in the suit, by name, Ogirala Venkata Subbamma. She had one son, by name, Krishnamurthy who is the father of the defendants 2 and 3 in the suit and the husband of Ramathulasamma who is the mother of the defendants 2 and 3. As the said Krishnamurthy was leading a way-ward life and was not looking after the family and attending to the welfare of the children, the first defendant who was holding the property settled the said property in favour of the defendants 2 and 3 who are her grand-sons and who were minors represented by their mother Ramathulasamma as guardian by executing a registered settlement deed dt 13-12-1970 reserving life interest for herself and giving vested remainder rights in the property to the defendants 2 and 3. The p






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top