SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 870

MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI
Ramadasu Krishna Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Katla Vijayalaxmi – Respondent


M. H. S. ANSARI, J.

( 1 ) THESE three Civil Revision Petitions are filed by the petitioner-judgment debtor against an order of attachment made by the Court of District Munsif, madhira, Khammam District for execution of the decree for money in the suits filed by the respective respondents. The petitioner is an Employee of the government working in the office of the Executive Engineer and is a government employee. The petitioner is drawing a gross salary of rs. 5,602/ -. The particulars of the salary and the deductions made therefrom are as under: Deductions:


Pay

Rs. 3,750-00

GPF

Rs. 400-00


D. A.

Rs. 1,093-00

GPF Advance

Rs. 416-00


H. R. A.

Rs. 469-00

APGLI

Rs. 125-00


A. H. R. A.

Rs. 150-00

Group Insurance

Rs. 30-00


C. A.

Rs. 140-00

Profession Tax

Rs. 20-00


Gross Total

Rs. 5,602-00

F. A.

Rs. 100-00


APCO

Rs. 150-00


Total Recoveries

Rs. 1,241-00


( 2 ) THE short question that arises for consideration in the above Revision petitions is relating to the scope and interpretation of the term salary" used in Clause (i) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 60 of the Code of Civil procedure.

( 3 ) THE expression "salary" has been defined in Explanation II as the total monthly emo










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top