SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 860

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Nawab Mohd. Kabiruddin Khan, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
M. Krishna Rao, Hyderabad – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs in O. S. No. 1543 of 1987 on the file of IV Additional Judge, City civil Court are the petitioners in this CRP. Thecrparisesoutof an order passed by the IV Addl. Judge on a memo filed by the petitioners-plaintiffs seeking transfer of the suit to the Special Court constituted under A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act for trial and decision. The memo was filed on 9-9-1994. The application was allowed by an order dt. 12-9-1994 and the Court returned the plaint for presentation to proper Court. Against this order CRP No. 3786 of 1994 was filed by the 1st respondent-defendant. On 13-3-1995 this Court set aside the aforementioned order on the ground that the order was passed without hearing the counsel for the defendant and the order did not disclose any reasons. The case was remitted to the 4th Addl. Judge for fresh disposal. After hearing both the counsel the impugned order was passed on 10-4-1995 rejecting the petitioner s request to transfer the suit. Aggrieved by thisorder the present CRP is filed by the plaintiffs in the suit.

( 2 ) THE suit was filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the petition








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top