S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner seeks a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order in ROC. ; No. 18/96. C. II/1, dated 30-4-1996 passed by the 1st respondent and to direct the respondents to give all consequential benefits, etc.

( 2 ) THE petitioner states that he was appointed as Copyist on 10-5-1982, and that he was promoted as Typist in the year 1983 and worked in several places in Kurnool District. While he was working as Typist in the Sub-Court at atmakur, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him by the 2nd respondent herein on 10-2-1993. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Kurnool was appointed as an Enquiry Officer to conduct the enquiry against him. The enquiry Officer framed seven charges and found charges 3 and 4 proved in his enquiry report dated 22-8-1994 in Enquiry No. 1 of 1993. The 2nd respondent agreed with the Enquiry Officer as regardshis findings on charges 3 and 4, but disagreed with him as regards findings on charge No. 5 and found that charge also proved against the petitioner herein in his order in Dis. No. 7822/estt/95 dated 24-11-1995. It is stated in the said order that on those findings, a show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner as to w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document