( 1 ) HE learned Counsel on either side have appeared. With the consent of the parties, the case is heard and disposed of.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 before the Special Court under A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act is the petitioner before us assailing the judgment delivered by that forum in L. G. C. No. 164 of 1994. Respondent No. 2 filed the case before the land Grabbing Court seeking relief against the petitioner as also Respondent no3 for acts of land grabbing alleged to have been made by them. Her case before the Court was that she was purchaser of Plot No. 60 in Survey nos. 41/1 and 474of Malkajgiri Mandal, R. R. District on 11-5-1992 and that the petitioner, who had earlier purchased the adjacent Plot No. 59 to the west of Plot no. 60, had encroached 55 sq. yards from that plot and that likewise Respondent no. 3, who was the purchaser of Plot No. 58 to the west of Plot No. 59 had encroached 45 sq. yards in Plot No. 59. The petitioner contested the case saying that he had purchased the house on Plot No. 59 on 3-9-1987 from V. S. Kathija Bee and M/s. G. Laxmaiah and Sons and that he had not made any encroachment on plot No. 60.

( 3 ) THE admitted facts are that Acs. 4-08 gunta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document