SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1032

S.PARVATHA RAO
D. Peri Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. Finance and Planning Department – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners are aggrieved by the stoppage of payment of unhealthy locality allowance (Bad Climate Allowance), Special Compensatory allowance Rent-free quarters or Additional House Rent Allowance in lieu of rent free from quarters from 1-3-1996. Therefore, they seek a Writ of Mandamus deciding the payment of the said allowances with effect from 1-3-1996 after declaring that the stoppage of the said payments is violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) WE do not see how that can be done unless the petitioners establish that they have a right to the said allowances. It is not the case of the petitioners that some Government servants in the State are being paid the said allowances and that they are being denied in spite of their being placed in a similar position as the others receiving the said benefit. The learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents are agreed that no State government servant is being paid the said allowances after 1 -3-1996. No doubt, the Government appointed a Committee to enquire into the question as regards the feasibility of continuing the said allowances. It is stated







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top