SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1066

P.RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU
Sri Venkateswara Oil Company, Tirupati Partners – Appellant
Versus
Guduru Jalaja Reddy – Respondent


P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANT Nos. 1 to 3 are the appellants. One Guduru Chengareddy, father of the third respondent filed the suit for recovery of possession of the plaint schedule vacant site, and for arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 23,250/- together with future profits.

( 2 ) THE material allegations as disclosed in the plaint are summarised hereunder: the plaint schedule property originally belonged to Guduru Atchamma, the mother of the first plaintiff as she got the same under registered partition deed dated 14-7-1956 between herself and defendant Nos. l to 3 and others. In fact, defendant Nos. 1 to 3 are the brother s sons of the said Atchamma. Defendant Nos. 1 to 3, and 4th defendant who is the third respondent herein, who is the son of the first plaintiff are the partners in a registered firm called sri Venkateswara Oil Company, Tirupati and they obtained the plaint schedule site from the said Atchamma on lease for running a business in Diesel and petrol, etc. The lease commenced on 1-5-1965 on a monthly rent of rs. 750/ -. The defendants had been paying rents to Atchamma and obtaining receipts. Atchamma died on 24-5-1971 leaving behind her the 1st plaintiff, her


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top