SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1149

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : B.K.SOMASEKHARA, P.S.MISHRA, V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
Nagendra Mohan Patnaik - Appellant
Versus
Government Of A.P.rep.by its Secretary, Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, Hyderabad - Respondent
Decided On : 11-12-96

Headnote:

Andhra Pradesh Transplantation of Human organs Act, 1995 - Andhra Pradesh transplantation of Human Organs Ordinance, 1994 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 309 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 – Jurisdiction - Storage and transplantation of human organs for therapeutic purpose - Prevention of commercial dealings on human organs - Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of constitution of India, petitioners have alleged that Act has such provisions which violate Articles 21 and 14 of Constitution of India and they for said reason are ultra virus to Constitution of India - Before court take up a brief prospecting into provisions of Act for appreciation of objects of Act, court may profitably refer to Central act called Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994, which is enacted by Parliament in pursuance of Clause 1 of Article 252 of Constitution of India on resolutions having been passed by all Houses of Legislatures of States of Goa Himachal Pradesh and Maharashtra to provide for regulation of removal storage and transplantation of human organs for therapeutic purpose and for prevention of commercial dealings on human organs and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto – Held, Time court are fully convinced shall always be essence in treatment of ailments in which transplant of organ is needed for therapeutic purposes - No one in such cases can afford to make delay - Authorization Committee or appellate authority for that reason cannot embark on a lengthy inquiry spread over days and months - Court are of clear view and good reasons to believe that Authorization Committee and appellate authority shall act with quickest dispatch and deliver their orders within such period of time which hospital Doctor or medical practitioner would indicate for purpose of removal of organ and transplantation - Court have looked into order impugned in Writ Petition from which Writ Appeal has arisen which has been produced before us - Since court have indicated procedure which authorization Committee is expected to follow in our judgment above court do not propose to mention grounds on which such applications can be rejected - Court are however satisfied that if so advised petitioner-appellant jointly with donor can make a fresh application for approval of authorization for removal and transplantation by Authorization committee - In case any such application is filed same shall be considered strictly in accordance with law – Appeal dismissed

P. S. MISHRA, C. J.

( 1 ) WRIT Appeals 1272 and 1273 of 1996 were posted for admission and with the agreement of the parties they have been taken up for final hearing along with the batch of Writ Petitions, which have been filed questioning the vires of some of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Transplantation of Human organs Act, 1995 (Act No. 24 of 1995 ). The Act was preceded by Ordinance called Andhra Pradesh Transplantation of Human Organs Ordinance, 1995. Since the Act has come into force, any reference to the constitutional vires of the provisions of the Ordinance is no longer necessary.

( 2 ) INVOKING the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the constitution of India, the petitioners have alleged that the Act has such provisions which violate Articles 21 and 14 of the Constitution of India and they, for the said reason, are ultra vires to the Constitution of India.

( 3 ) BEFORE we take up a brief prospecting into the provisions of the Act for appreciation of the objects of the Act, we may profitably refer to the Central act No. 42 of 1994 called The Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994, which is enacted by the Parliament in pursuance of Clause 1 of Article 252 of the Constitution of India on resolutions having been passed by all the Houses of Legislatures of the States of Goa, Himachal Pradesh and Maharashtra, to provide for regulation of removal, storage and transplantation of human organs for therapeutic purpose and for the prevention of commercial dealings on human organs and for the matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. This Act 42 of 1994 applies in the first instance, to the whole of the states of Goa, Himachal Pradesh and Maharashtra and to all the Union territories and shall be so applicable to such other State or States, which adopts or adopt the Act by resolution passed in that behalf under Clause 1 of Article 252 of the Constitution of India. The Legislature of the State of Andhra Pradesh, however, has enacted in the Forty Sixth Year of the Republic of India, Act 24 of 1995 for the same purpose as the Central Act 42 of 1994, stating the objects and reasons as follows:"keeping in view the considerable advancement in Medical Sciences in recent times and the worldwide practice of transplantation of human organs, the Government of India have enacted the Transplantation of human Organs Act, 1994. On the same lines, in the State of Andhra pradesh, Governor has promulgated the Andhra Pradesh transplantation of Human Organs Ordinance, 1994 (Andhra Pradesh ordinance 18 of 1994) on the 8th September, 1994. As certain provisions of the Ordinance were under examination, a Bill replacing the said ordinance could not be introduced in the Legislative Assembly and as a result, the said Ordinance lapsed on the 21st- February, 1995. As it was decided to have a law for the regulation of removal, storage and transplantation of human organs for therapeutic purposes and for prevention of commercial dealings on human organs immediately, government have decided to promulgate an ordinance for the purpose on the same lines with certain minor modifications. As the Legislative assembly of the State was not then in session having been prorogued, the Andhra Pradesh Transplantation of Human Organce Ordinance, 1995 was promulgated by the Governor on the 9th March, 1995. "

( 4 ) THE objects thus stated are - (1) for the regulation of removal, storage and transplantation of human organs for therapeutic purpose; (2) for the prevention of commercial dealings on human organs. human organ is defined under Section 2 (i) of the Act, unless the context otherwise requires, to mean any part of a human body consisting of a structured arrangement of tissues which, if wholly removed, cannot be replicated by the body. The act thus intends to regulate removal, storage and transplantation of human organs and prevention of commercial dealings on human organs consisting of a structured arrangement of tissues, which on removal
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top