SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1149

V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY, P.S.MISHRA, B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Nagendra Mohan Patnaik – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. rep. by its Secretary, Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, Hyderabad – Respondent


P. S. MISHRA, C. J.

( 1 ) WRIT Appeals 1272 and 1273 of 1996 were posted for admission and with the agreement of the parties they have been taken up for final hearing along with the batch of Writ Petitions, which have been filed questioning the vires of some of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Transplantation of Human organs Act, 1995 (Act No. 24 of 1995 ). The Act was preceded by Ordinance called Andhra Pradesh Transplantation of Human Organs Ordinance, 1995. Since the Act has come into force, any reference to the constitutional vires of the provisions of the Ordinance is no longer necessary.

( 2 ) INVOKING the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the constitution of India, the petitioners have alleged that the Act has such provisions which violate Articles 21 and 14 of the Constitution of India and they, for the said reason, are ultra vires to the Constitution of India.

( 3 ) BEFORE we take up a brief prospecting into the provisions of the Act for appreciation of the objects of the Act, we may profitably refer to the Central act No. 42 of 1994 called The Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994, which is enacted by the Parliament in pursuance of Clause 1 of Articl

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top