SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1199

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
P. Apparao – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Govt. Pleader for Home.

( 2 ) IN the instant writ petition, the petitioner prays for an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in maintaining K. D. Sheet No. 247 against the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary.

( 3 ) THE petitioner, no doubt, was involved in some criminal cases during the year 1976, 1979 and 1980. It is required to notice that the petitioner was convicted in CC. Nos. 1483/1976, 1583/76 and 181/79 respectively and he was bound over by the Executive Mandal Magistrate, Tadepalligudem in m. C. No. 19/96 by an order Dt. 15-4-1996. Consequent upon the conviction, the History sheet was opened against the petitioner by the respondents in exercise of the power under Standing Order No. 734 of A. P. Police Standing orders and the same is being continued for all these years. It is important to notice that there are no cases against the petitioner registered as such after 1980 except one proceeding u/sec. 110 Cr. P. C. in Cr. No. 87/96 on the file of the Executive Mandal Magistrate, Tadepalligudem, It i





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top