SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1176

B.S.A.SWAMY
Nalajala Jagannadham – Appellant
Versus
Veerepally Mangamma – Respondent


B. S. A. SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by the orders of the District Munsif of Kodada in LA. No. 125/96 in O. S. No. 34/92 on an application filed by the petitioner under Sec. 38 (2) of the Indian Stamp Act wherein the District Munsif refused to forward the document in question to the R. D. O. for impounding and levied ten times penalty under the impression, that this Court directed him to do so while disposing of CRP No. 3769/95 dated 28-12-1995, the present Revision petition is filed.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that the petitioner purchased an extent of Ac 2-00 of land for a consideration of Rs. 64,000/- under an agreement of sale executed on five rupee stamp paper on 28-5-1989 from one Nalajala tulisamma. But the vendor without executing a regular sale deed filed O. S. No. 877/89 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kodada for a permanent injunction and failed to get a temporary injunction. In those circumstances, the vendor executed a registered sale deed in favour of the respondent on 26-1-1990 and on the basis of that sale deed the respondent filed the present suit O. S. No. 34/92 seeking permanent injunction against the petitioner.

( 3 ) AT the time of trial, on a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top