T.RANGA RAO
Devineni Durgamba – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Financiers, rep. by its Managing Partner – Respondent
( 1 ) ). THIS appeal is filed against the orders dated 30-6-1994 in EA No. 489/1993 in EP No. 32/87 in O. S. No. 587/1983 on the file of the Principal Subordinate judge, Tenali. That was a petition filed under Order 21 Rule 106 and Sec. 151 c. P. C. requesting to set aside the dismissal order dated 12-8-1993 in EA. No. 291/1991 and restore the same.
( 2 ) ). It appears that the properties of the appellant herein Devineni Durgamba were sold in court auction on 4-4-1991 in execution of the decree in EP. No. 32/87 and the appellant herein filed application in E. A. No. 291/91 under order 21 Rule 89 CPC seeking to set aside the sale and the said petition was dismissed for default on 12-8-93. The appellant filed EA No. 489/93 seeking to set aside the default order and restoration of EA No. 291/91 and the said petition was dismissed on 30-6-1994.
( 3 ) AGGRIEVED by the said order, the appellant filed this Civil Miscellaneous appeal.
( 4 ) ). On the grounds urged before me, the point that arises for consideration is whether the impugned order is unsustainable in law?
( 5 ) THE learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the petitioner s counsel was present and ready fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.