SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1258

S.PARVATHA RAO
T. Doraswamy Reddy – Appellant
Versus
K. Kodanda naidu – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner questions the order of the 1st Additional District Munsif, chittoor in O. E. P. No. 257 of 1988 in o. S. No. 616 of 1985 dated 14-3-1990 directing the judgment-debtor to pay the entire decretal amount of Rs. 21,318. 75 ps. , which included interest upto 2-9-1988, on or before 30-4-1990 failing which he would be liable for arrest without any further enquiry.

( 2 ) THIS C. R. P. was admitted on 23-4-1990 and this Court granted interim stay in c. M. P. No. 5941 of 1990 on condition that the petitioner deposited one-fourth of the decretal amount within two months and permitting the respondent/decree-holder to withdraw the amount, if deposited, without furnishing security. The petitioner sought extension of time on 14-6-1990 in C. M. P. No. 7689of 1990 and on 15-6-1990 it was extended by 10 weeks. On the respondent s C. M. P. No. 17743 of 1990 for vacating the interim stay, this Court on 24-1-1991 ordered that the interim stay be made absolute subject to the condition of the petitioner paying another one-fourth of the decretal amount within one month from that day, and permitting the respondents to withdraw the amount, if any deposited, without fu





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top