SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 1381

B.V.RANGA RAJU, S.PARVATHA RAO
Sri Vishnu Cements Ltd. , Nalgonda Dist – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Electricity Board, Hyderabad – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the levy of maximum demand charges during the period of non-supply of power as illegal, arbitrary, high handed and void and consequently directing the respondents to refund the entire amount of maximum demand charges collected from the petitioner for non-supply days during the power cut period etc.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a public limited company. It set up a cement manufacturing unit and received electrical energy from the 1st Respondent Board under high tension with a maximum contracted demand of 15 MVA by 4-12-1987. It is stated that its annual licensing capacity is 5 lakh tonnes of cement per annum, and that it requires roughly about 55 to 60 lakh units for reaching optimum production. Under B. P. Ms. No. 1013, (Commercial) dated 14-11-1987, the respondents imposed power cut with effect from 15-11-1987 and all H. T. consumers were directed to regulate their consumption of power as indicated therein. The petitioner was "required to regulate its consumption by 60% of the average consumption of power during the period 1-4-1986 to 31-3-1987, which was subsequently increased to 90% cut". On behalf of the pet










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top