SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 70

B.K.SOMASEKHARA
Maddu Tatha – Appellant
Versus
Uttaravilli Nagamani – Respondent


B. K. SOMASEKHARA, J.

( 1 ) THE judgment of the learned Sub-Judge, Rajam in A. S. No. 9/1991 dated 21-3-1994 is assailed in this appeal. That appeal was against the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Munsif, Rajam in O. S. No. 179/86, dated 2-4-1991. The suit was filed by the present respondent against the present appellants for permanent injunction restraining the appellants from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property which is described as Survey No. 152 of O. Punja (mettu) with an extent of Ac. 2. 00 situate in Boddam village in Srikakulam district. That was contested by the appellants. They denied the plaintiff s possession and the lawful possession of the suit property in addition to setting up their own rightand possession over the same. The parties went to trial wherein the plaintiff examined herself as P. W. I and got examined two witnesses as per P. Ws. 2 and 3 whereas defendant No. 3 got himself examined as D. W. I and defendant No. l as D. W. 2 and two witnesses as per D. Ws. 3 and 4 respectively. By way of documentary evidence the plaintiff got marked Exs. A-1 and A-2 and none by the defendant. An Advocate-Co
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top