SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 76

S.R.NAYAK
K. Venkateswarlu – Appellant
Versus
Nagarjuna Grameena Bank, Khammam – Respondent


S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is by a dismissed bank employee calling in question the validity and legality of the orders made by the second respondent-Disciplinary Authority imposing the penalty of removal from service as a measure of punishment for the alleged misconduct committed by the petitioner and that of the first respondent which is the Appellate Authority under Regulation 30 (1) of the Rayalaseema Grameena Bank Staff Service Regulations 1980, for short the Regulations confirming the order of the Disciplinary Authority.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was appointed as an officer by the Management of the first respondent-Nagarjuna Grameena Bank and he was posted as Manager of Chinturu branch on 4-8-1978. The petitioner worked at that branch as the Manager of the bank from 4-5-1978 to24-5-1980. There after wards the petitioner was transferred to Sujathanagar branch of the respondent-bank in Knammam district. When the petitioner was working as an officer in the Sujathanagar branch the second respondent issued a charge memo dt. 11-8-1983 to the petitioner alleging commission of certain misconduct by the petitioner. The cha



















































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top