MOTILAL B.NAIK
M. Shiv Raj – Appellant
Versus
Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad – Respondent
( 1 ) THE present Civil Revision Petition is filed invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking appropriate direction.
( 2 ) PETITIONER is the husband. Second respondent is the wife. Respondents 3 and 4 are claiming to be the children dependent on the petitioner.
( 3 ) EARLIER in the year 1977, the second respondent wife had filed Maintenance Petition in M. C. No. 63/77 under Section 125 of Cr. P. C. on the file of the V Metropolitan Magistrate seeking maintenance for herself and for her daughter the third respondent herein. The said M. C. No. 63/77 was allowed by the V Metropolitan Magistrate Court who granted maintenance directing the petitioner herein to pay Rupees 75/- per month to the second respondent-wife and Rs. 50. 00 per month to the third respondent-daughter. Later, this amount seems to have been enhanced to Rs. 100. 00 per month in favour of the wife and Rupees 75/- per month in favour of the third respondent-daughter.
( 4 ) IT is alleged that the second respondent-wife again filed another maintenance case in M. C. No. 21/90 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate notwithstanding the fact that she had already filed M. C. No. 63/77 o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.