SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 142

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Y. Lalithamma – Appellant
Versus
Special Tahsildar – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is preferred against the order of the Land Reforms Appellate tribunal, Kurnool in L. R. A. No. 20 of 1992. The dispute arises out of the declaration filed by one Smt. P. Parvathamma in the year 1975 under the Andhra pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act. After due enquiry, it was determined that she held iand of 2. 1652 S. Hs in excess of the ceiling area. When a notice directing her to surrender surplus land was issued she surrendered an extent of land equivalent to 1. 1766 S. H. and the surrender was accepted by an order passed on 7-6-1978. She was yet to surrender 0. 9886 s. H. While so, Parvathamma died in the year 1984. Her daughters then put forward a claim that certain lands were given to them towards pasupukumkuma and therefore those lands have to be excluded from the holding of the original declarant in which case the original declarant had to surrender only 0. 1920 S. H. The Land Reforms Tribunal allowed the application filed by the daughters of the original declarant. The State preferred an appeal. The Appellate Tribunal by its order dated 28-2-89 allowed the appeal preferred by the State. The revision fi



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top