SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 190

LINGARAJA RATH
K. Ratnagireswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
APSEB, Hyderabad – Respondent


LINGARAJA RATH, J.

( 1 ) THE relief claimed in this case is for issue of a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to absorb the petitioner in the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board (for briefly - Board) Engineering Service and setting aside the decision of APSEB communicated to the petitioner on 4-8-1992 to repatriate him to irrigation and command Area Development Department.

( 2 ) THE undisputed facts are that the petitioner entered the services of the electricity Department in 1964 as a Supervisor (Civil) and was posted in Sileru project where he continued till 1977 when he was transferred to Vijayawada thermal Power Station. The post was re-designated in 1979 as Additional assistant Engineer (Civil ). While continuingassuch, the petitioner had applied to Andhra Pradesh Service Commission for appointment as a Supervisor in the p. W. D. Department. He was selected for the appointment and thereafter was treated as on deputation to the Electricity Department from the Irrigation and command Area Development Department. The Board was formed in the year 1967 or 1968. All the employees of the Electricity Departmentas also of different projects were transferred to the newly formed Board and







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top