SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 182

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY
K. V. Mallikarjuna Rao – Appellant
Versus
Department of Home – Respondent


B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a public interest litigation initialed by two practising advocates espousing cause of judiciary for deleting the two offending scenes in the feature film Gentleman, which was produced in Telugu, Tamil and Hindi languages. The two offending scenes objected by the petitioners are: (1) the Judge presiding the Court stands up and says Namaskars to the Chief Minister when he enters the Court hall on being called at the instance of the hero, who was made accused and who accuses the Chief Minister, and (2) the statue of Goddess of Justice holding scales containing currency notes.

( 2 ) THE writ petition was admitted on 5-12-1994 and notices were issued to the respondents. As on that day, this Court (incidentally I was the admission Judge) was not aware of the said scenes and there was difficulty in passing orders without there being uncontroverted fact. Now a counter is filed sworn in by one Mr. D. Kailasa Prasad, Director, Central Board of Film Certification, 5th respondent herein and also on behalf of respondents 4 and 6 herein, viz. , the Central Board of Film Certification, Bombay and Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, represented by its Secr








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top