SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 224

K.S.SHRIVASTAVA
Krishnaveni Constructions – Appellant
Versus
Executive Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Darsi – Respondent


K. S. SHRIVASTAV, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this writ petition challenges the letter issued by the 1st respondent on 15-7-1993, by which the 1st respondent forfeited and recovered a sum of Rs. 1,12,800. 00 of the petitioner-firm, which had been deposited by it as earnest money with the 5th respondent-Bank. The petitioner also prays for the refund of Rupees 1,12,800/- with interest.

( 2 ) IN answer to the tender notice issued by the 1st respondent on 1-2-1993, the petitioner-firm submitted its tender on 17-3-1993 for construction of a summer storage tank at Darsi, a segment of Comprehensive Protected Water Supply Scheme to Kanigiri and 18 other villages. The estimated value of the summer storage tank was Rs. 80,00,000. 00. The petitioner-firm, along with its tender, deposited a term deposit receipt No. 372206 for Rs. 1,12,800. 00 towards the earnest money deposit. In presence of the partner of the petitioner-firm the tender was opened at 4. 15 p. m. The tender of the petitioner-firm was the lowest. The petitioner-firm at about 6. 30 p. m. , submitted a letter to the 1st respondent requesting therein not to consider its tender on the ground that it was misguided by the standard sched












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top