P. VENKATARAMA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). Petitioner is the tenant. He has questioned the order of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, R. A. No. 174 of 1993) confirming the order passed in R. C. No. 345/89. By an order dated 29-2-1993 in R. C. 345/89, the learned Rent Controller closed the R. C. in view of the order passed on the same day in LA. 24/93 allowing the application of the landlord under Section 11 (4) of the Act. The petitioner-tenant was directed, to vacate the premises within two months.

( 2 ) THE main Rent Control case -- R. C. 345/89 was filed for the eviction of the tenant on the ground of wilful default in payment of the rent and also on the ground that the premises was required for personal occupation of the landlord. Along with the main petition, the landlord also filed an application under Section 11 of the Act seeking an order directing the tenant to deposit the arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 35,000. 00. In the mam R. C. as well as in the application filed under Section 11, it was alleg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document