SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 255

S.PARVATHA RAO
Jaya Salome – Appellant
Versus
Telugu University – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE perplexing question raised in this writ petition is whether the so called transfer of the fourth-respondent from the post of Director, Publications Division as a Professor in the Department of Folk Arts in the School of Fine Arts of the first respondent university, i. e. , Telugu University, is valid. At that time the petitioner had been the head of Folk Arts Department as she was the Reader in that Department and there was no Professor. If the appointment by transfer of the fourth respondent as professor is valid, there can be no doubt that he would be the Head of the department of Folk Arts replacing the petitioner, as he in fact did after his appointment as Professor. The petitioner s complaint is that but for the transfer of the fourth respondent as Professor she would have continued as the Head of the department of Folk Arts and aggrieved by the deprivation, she questions the action of the authorities concerned of the first respondent University in effecting the transfer.

( 2 ) BEFORE grasping the nettle of questions arising for resolution in this writ petition, first the necessary factual back-ground has to be sketched: The petitioner is a post-


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top