( 1 ) SINCE this Writ petition is directed against an order made by the first respondent Labour Court in an interlocutory application, the Court felt it just and necessary to hear the learned Counsel for the authorities and dispose of the writ petition, though the W. V. M. P. No. 10345/95 filed in this writ petition was posted for hearing and orders today. Accordingly the learned counsel for the parties were heard.

( 2 ) THE second respondent is a workman and the petitioner is the Management. The petitioner-Management held a domestic enquiry against the second respondent against alleged misconduct and after conducting enquiry removed the second respondent as a measure of punishment under the Regulations. Against the order of the Disciplinary Authority the second respondent raised an Industrial Dispute in I. D. No. 741/93 which is pending before the first respondent Labour Court. In the claim statement filed by the second respondent-workman the second respondent questioned the validity of the domestic enquiry held by the disciplinary authority. When that preliminary issued was posted before the Industrial Court on 18-11-1994 the second respondent workman conceded tha