K.M.AGARWAL, V.RAJAGOPALA REDDY
G. Narasimhulu Chetti – Appellant
Versus
S. Pandurangaiah Chetti – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS LPA arises out of the judgment and decree of the learned single Judge in A. S. No. 1772/84, dismissing the appeal though for different reasons and confirming the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 72/75 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Chittoor.
( 2 ) ORIGINALLY there were three plaintiffs. On the death of the 1st plaintiff, his legal representatives were brought on record as plaintiff No. 4 and defendants 6 and 7. Defendants 1 and 2 also died and their legal representatives were brought on record as defendants 8 to 16. Defendants 2 to 5 were the tenants of the suit property. The suit was for declaration of title to the suit property, which is a house and vacant site and for possession. The suit was dismissed by the trial court and in appeal the learned single Judge confirmed the trial court s decree and judgment, though for different reasons. Hence this Letters Patent Appeal by the plaintiffs.
( 3 ) THE facts are not in dispute. Two ladies Kamalambal and Lokambal executed the deed Ex. A4 on 22-5-1958 in favour of P. W. 1, who is the son of Kamalambal s husband by his first wife, in respect of various properties including the suit pro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.